Guilty or Not Guilty

[IsabellaRose]

I wouldn't have been guilty unless you brought it up, but now I'm 100% guilty.

 

The next person is now planning their own sex tourism adventure.

[WickedCadrach]

Not Guilty. Who needs sex tourism when I have a keyboard and all of you and no money ? 

The next person has brought a pet on a vacation.

[IsabellaRose]

Not guilty. First, who gets to go on vacation? Second, if I did, Miss Kitty is not an adventurous cat.

 

The next person has a fursona.

[WritesNaughtyStories]

Not guilty. As an avid roleplayer I tend to create alteregos based on the story that has presented itself. Even at the game table I've never used a persistent character from one campaign to the next. ADD, I guess.

Next poster has one OC that use consistently, if not exclusively.

[Minorikawa]

Barely-guilty. I have a few characters I like to use repeatedly since they feel so defined and right, and can conveniently work in multiple stories. However, I'm not one to exclusively use just one or a a couple characters, especially since it can create issues of "Oh, wait, that wasn't our story, that was another..."

The next poster is, like me, wondering if the term "sex vacation" is as simple as it sounds or means something very specific.

[WickedCadrach]

Well, I'm Guilty now.  My understanding is that sex tourism is planning a vacation specifically around going somewhere with a reputation and possibly accommodating laws that make purchasing sex easy and accessible, even for tourists. If it means something more specific than that, I'll need to be enlightened. 

The next person has done some form of sexual training (Kegel exercises leap to mind, though people do those for reasons other than sexual performance too...)