Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
Man hired now for years in a rich family usually drive to school and back to school the little girl of the family. He had gradually grown sexually attracted by her and will do anything to corrupt and get her.
So basically, need someone to play the driver, need to be a man, obviously, between 30 and 50, appearance doens't matter. Can be fat, ugly, doesn't matter. In fact could be better. The whole is about corruption, taking advantage, "lollipop blind test" game, outdoor fuck and once totally submitted, can even take a good cum bath from every employees of the house.
An interesting discussion idea that I had the other day:
Do you think that out of context screenshots or game CG count as spoilers?
Say for example that I provided a screenshot of one of the Gen I Pokémon games, to show an example of the warp panels or something. It may be of a single room in a certain building, but there's no context to it.
Or, I take a screenshot of the route on which I caught a certain Pokémon.
Taking it a little further, to the main point: background art in story modes, with no dialogue or anything like that, just the art... Do you personally consider that a spoiler? I mean, sure, you see the art before you get that far/unlock it, but it provides no real context.
And, for example, say there's one thing you can do to unlock all background art in a game (without any dialogue/context, other than being in the correct order)... Would you look at the art before playing through the story mode? Or would you ignore the Gallery until you 'unlocked' all the art legitimately?
Just curious about what people think. If this gets any interest, I'll share my opinion.
Okay folks, I'm aiming for the big ideas today since I'm full of sugar and have time on my hand. As people keep mentioning the topic one way and another on this site, I figured that it would be useful discussing what free speech is and what it may entail. Just so we have a baseline with which to start discussion with, here SHOULD be a uncontroversial definition of it.
Free Speech - A political right that is largely guaranteed in the world's democratic governments, which can be found in the form of either a direct principle in constitutions or a accepted social norm alluded to in derived legislation. It is enshrined in Article 19 of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights as one of the most important rights that humans have.The right to free speech involves not only the making of speech (no matter the medium), but also covers the formation and distribution of mentioned speech acts (no matter the medium). The right itself allows for people to form, seek out and impart opinions, views and information to others without government or 'outside' interference and largely outside legal prosecution (though there exists exceptions). In general, the right to free speech is possessed by all by standard recognition of human's equal moral status but is usually administered by national government over their people.
Now that's out of the way, let's talk about something more debatable LIKE the following:
1. Should everyone be allowed the right to say anything they wished, for whatever reason they want, in whatever form they desire?
2. Is there a difference between speech made in 'public' (let's say...in a government building or in a shopping centre or in Parliament) or in private?
3. Should there be any restriction on speech made in different contexts and environments?